Journal of vascular surgery · 2017
Evaluation of paramalleolar and inframalleolar bypasses in dialysis- and nondialysis-dependent patients with critical limb ischemia.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kikuchi Shinsuke, Sasajima Tadahiro, Inaba Masashi, Uchida Daiki, Kokubo Taku, Saito Yukihiro, Koya Atsuhiro, Uchida Hisashi, Azuma Nobuyoshi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of paramalleolar or inframalleolar bypass (PIMB) in hemodialysis-dependent (HD) patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and nonhemodialysis-dependent (NHD) patients in terms of clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2013, there were 333 consecutive arteriosclerosis obliterans patients with CLI who underwent 401 PIMB procedures for limb salvage (LS). Of the 333 patients, 188 (56.5%) were HD patients. Vein grafts were exclusively used, and 172 paramalleolar and 229 inframalleolar bypasses were performed. Five-year primary and secondary cumulative graft patency, LS, and amputation-free survival (AFS) rates were compared between the two groups, and the independent determinants of these outcomes were identified in each group.
RESULTS: The 5-year primary and secondary cumulative graft patency rates were 53% and 82% in HD patients and 69% and 92% in NHD patients (primary cumulative graft patency, P < .05; secondary cumulative graft patency, nonsignificant), respectively. The LS rates were 87% and 99% (P < .01) in HD patients and NHD patients, respectively. Overall, 48% and 70% of HD and NHD patients were ambulatory before PIMB (P < .01), and 73% and 85% of HD and NHD patients were ambulatory 12 months after PIMB (including 1-year survivors; nonsignificant), respectively, demonstrating drastic post-PIMB improvement in HD patients. The 5-year AFS rates in the HD and NHD groups were 27% and 69% (P < .01), respectively, demonstrating very poor AFS rates in HD patients. In HD patients, factors negatively associated with AFS were female gender (hazard ratio [HR], 2.102; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.254-3.524), history of congestive heart failure (HR, 2.075; 95% CI, 1.395-3.085), and preoperative nonambulatory status (HR, 1.974; 95% CI, 1.305-2.986), whereas older age (HR, 2.601; 95% CI, 1.372-4.931) and history of congestive heart failure (HR, 2.928; 95% CI, 1.496-5.731) were identified as independent factors negatively associated with AFS in NHD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PIMB for CLI was associated with excellent LS rates in both HD and NHD patients with low operative mortality and complications. However, the AFS rate observed in HD patients was significantly lower than that observed in NHD patients, indicating the necessity of a specific management program to improve AFS after LS in HD patients.
METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2013, there were 333 consecutive arteriosclerosis obliterans patients with CLI who underwent 401 PIMB procedures for limb salvage (LS). Of the 333 patients, 188 (56.5%) were HD patients. Vein grafts were exclusively used, and 172 paramalleolar and 229 inframalleolar bypasses were performed. Five-year primary and secondary cumulative graft patency, LS, and amputation-free survival (AFS) rates were compared between the two groups, and the independent determinants of these outcomes were identified in each group.
RESULTS: The 5-year primary and secondary cumulative graft patency rates were 53% and 82% in HD patients and 69% and 92% in NHD patients (primary cumulative graft patency, P < .05; secondary cumulative graft patency, nonsignificant), respectively. The LS rates were 87% and 99% (P < .01) in HD patients and NHD patients, respectively. Overall, 48% and 70% of HD and NHD patients were ambulatory before PIMB (P < .01), and 73% and 85% of HD and NHD patients were ambulatory 12 months after PIMB (including 1-year survivors; nonsignificant), respectively, demonstrating drastic post-PIMB improvement in HD patients. The 5-year AFS rates in the HD and NHD groups were 27% and 69% (P < .01), respectively, demonstrating very poor AFS rates in HD patients. In HD patients, factors negatively associated with AFS were female gender (hazard ratio [HR], 2.102; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.254-3.524), history of congestive heart failure (HR, 2.075; 95% CI, 1.395-3.085), and preoperative nonambulatory status (HR, 1.974; 95% CI, 1.305-2.986), whereas older age (HR, 2.601; 95% CI, 1.372-4.931) and history of congestive heart failure (HR, 2.928; 95% CI, 1.496-5.731) were identified as independent factors negatively associated with AFS in NHD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PIMB for CLI was associated with excellent LS rates in both HD and NHD patients with low operative mortality and complications. However, the AFS rate observed in HD patients was significantly lower than that observed in NHD patients, indicating the necessity of a specific management program to improve AFS after LS in HD patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalArmArteriosclerosis ObliteransComorbidityCritical IllnessDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIschemiaKaplan-Meier EstimateKidneyLimb SalvageMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSaphenous VeinSex FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVascular GraftingVascular Patency