European journal of internal medicine · 2010
Prevalence of renal artery stenosis in flash pulmonary oedema: determination using gadolinium-enhanced MRA.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McMahon Colm J, Hennessy Martina, Boyle Gerard, Feely John, Meaney James F M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to determine the prevalence of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in patients presenting with acute ("flash") pulmonary oedema (FPE), without identifiable cause using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of renal arteries. A secondary goal was to correlate clinical parameters at presentation with the presence or absence of RAS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with acute pulmonary oedema without identifiable cause prospectively underwent CE-MRA. >50% renal artery stenosis was considered significant. Clinical parameters (blood pressure, serum creatinine, history of hypertension/hyperlipidaemia) were compared in patients with and without RAS using an unpaired t-test. Results expressed; mean (+/-SD).
RESULTS: 20 patients (4 male, 16 female, age 78.5+/-11 years) underwent CE-MRA. 9 patients (45%) had significant RAS (6 (30%) bilateral, 3 (15%) unilateral). Systolic BP was higher in patients with RAS (192+/-38 mm Hg) than those without (134+/-30 mm Hg) (p<.005). Diastolic BP was higher in patients with RAS (102+/-23 mm Hg) than those without (76+/-17 mm Hg) (p<.01). All patients with RAS and 6/11(55%) patients without RAS had a history of hypertension. No significant difference in creatinine or hyperlipidaemia history was observed.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RAS in patients presenting with FPE is 45%. The diagnosis should be considered in patients presenting with unexplained acute pulmonary oedema, particularly if hypertensive at presentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with acute pulmonary oedema without identifiable cause prospectively underwent CE-MRA. >50% renal artery stenosis was considered significant. Clinical parameters (blood pressure, serum creatinine, history of hypertension/hyperlipidaemia) were compared in patients with and without RAS using an unpaired t-test. Results expressed; mean (+/-SD).
RESULTS: 20 patients (4 male, 16 female, age 78.5+/-11 years) underwent CE-MRA. 9 patients (45%) had significant RAS (6 (30%) bilateral, 3 (15%) unilateral). Systolic BP was higher in patients with RAS (192+/-38 mm Hg) than those without (134+/-30 mm Hg) (p<.005). Diastolic BP was higher in patients with RAS (102+/-23 mm Hg) than those without (76+/-17 mm Hg) (p<.01). All patients with RAS and 6/11(55%) patients without RAS had a history of hypertension. No significant difference in creatinine or hyperlipidaemia history was observed.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RAS in patients presenting with FPE is 45%. The diagnosis should be considered in patients presenting with unexplained acute pulmonary oedema, particularly if hypertensive at presentation.