MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12875-026-03214-8

Медицинская библиотека · BMC primary care · 2026

Peak flow meter is a sensitive test for assessing airflow limitation in patients with respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma in primary health care in Brazil.

Tussi Leite Ana Paula, Friedrich Frederico, da Rosa Bruna Silveira, Antunes Géssica Luana, Rodrigues Fernandes Ingrid, Sezera Costa Lauren, Duarte Santos Leonardo, Severo da Costa Mariana, Rolim Camargo Tássia, Prata Soldi P Taube Mariah, A Cruz Álvaro, Jones Marcus H, Pitrez Paulo M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The peak flow meter is considered a complementary tool to spirometry for monitoring obstructive lung diseases. In many countries, spirometry is not easily accessible for diagnosing asthma in primary care. In this context, there has been growing interest in evaluating the role of the peak expiratory flow meter (PEFM) for asthma management, particularly in primary care settings. This study aims to assess the usefulness of PEFM in detecting airflow limitation (AFL), as identified by conventional spirometry, in a primary health care (PHC) setting in Brazil.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was nested within a clinical trial. Participants aged 6 to 65, both sexes, with a history of respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma and uncontrolled disease, from 28 PHC centers across all macroregions of Brazil were included. AFL was defined by spirometry according to international criteria and by PEFM when PEF was < 80% of the predicted value. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) equations were used for parameterization. The accuracy of PEFM in detecting AFL, as identified by spirometry, was analyzed, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were reported.

RESULTS

Among 298 participants, 107 (36%) had a confirmed asthma diagnosis. Spirometry identified AFL in 36% (n = 107) of participants, while PEFM detected AFL in 64.8% (n = 193). PEFM demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 82.4% (95% CI: 78.0%–86.7%) for detecting AFL compared with spirometry. Specificity was 44.4% (95% CI: 38.8%–50.0%), and AUC for the PEFM was 0.73. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for absolute PEFM values was 0.01 (95% CI: -0.18 to 0.20, p = 0.473).

CONCLUSIONS

The PEFM demonstrates high sensitivity for AFL, but it should be used with caution as a stand-alone tool for asthma diagnosis. Given its low cost and easy access in PHC settings, PEFM seems to be a useful initial screening tool for AFL, especially in resource-limited settings.

Для цитирования: Tussi Leite Ana Paula, Friedrich Frederico, da Rosa Bruna Silveira, Antunes Géssica Luana, Rodrigues Fernandes Ingrid, Sezera Costa Lauren, Duarte Santos Leonardo, Severo da Costa Mariana, Rolim Camargo Tássia, Prata Soldi P Taube Mariah, A Cruz Álvaro, Jones Marcus H, Pitrez Paulo M. Peak flow meter is a sensitive test for assessing airflow limitation in patients with respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma in primary health care in Brazil.. BMC primary care. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-026-03214-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.