International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2019
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the distribution of spray and irrigation devices within the sinonasal cavities.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Siu Joey, Johnston James Jordan, Pontre Beau, Inthavong Kiao, Douglas Richard George
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Optimizing intranasal distribution and retention of nasal sprays is essential in the management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), including those that have had functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Despite multiple existing distribution studies, there remains a need for a technique that allows regionalization of particle deposition within a patient's unique 3-dimensional (3D) geometry without exposing the patient to radiation.
METHODS: Seven participants delivered normal saline containing a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) by either saline irrigation or nasal sprays on 1 side of the nasal cavity. The saline irrigation group included 2 participants (both healthy) while the nasal spray group included 5 participants (2 healthy, 2 post-FESS patients, 1 CRS patient without any sinus surgery). The distribution of new signal enhancement was assessed on each participant using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Serial scans were performed over an interval of 4 minutes in the nasal spray group to assess changes in intranasal distribution over time.
RESULTS: Signal enhancement was widespread within the nasal cavities and maxillary sinuses of participants (both healthy) that underwent sinus irrigation. For the nasal spray participants, the hotspots for signal enhancement were similar regardless of disease status or previous history of surgery. These included the internal nasal valve, anterior septum, inferior surface of the inferior turbinate, nasal floor, and nasopharynx. No signal enhancement was detected with nasal sprays in either unoperated or operated paranasal sinuses.
CONCLUSION: A technique has been developed using MRI evaluation of radioopaque contrast to characterize the temporospatial distribution of topical drug delivery within the sinonasal cavities.
METHODS: Seven participants delivered normal saline containing a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) by either saline irrigation or nasal sprays on 1 side of the nasal cavity. The saline irrigation group included 2 participants (both healthy) while the nasal spray group included 5 participants (2 healthy, 2 post-FESS patients, 1 CRS patient without any sinus surgery). The distribution of new signal enhancement was assessed on each participant using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Serial scans were performed over an interval of 4 minutes in the nasal spray group to assess changes in intranasal distribution over time.
RESULTS: Signal enhancement was widespread within the nasal cavities and maxillary sinuses of participants (both healthy) that underwent sinus irrigation. For the nasal spray participants, the hotspots for signal enhancement were similar regardless of disease status or previous history of surgery. These included the internal nasal valve, anterior septum, inferior surface of the inferior turbinate, nasal floor, and nasopharynx. No signal enhancement was detected with nasal sprays in either unoperated or operated paranasal sinuses.
CONCLUSION: A technique has been developed using MRI evaluation of radioopaque contrast to characterize the temporospatial distribution of topical drug delivery within the sinonasal cavities.