Medecine et maladies infectieuses · 2016
Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis by ELISPOT assay and tuberculin skin test.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Du F, Zhang Z, Gao T, Liu Z, Jia H, Xing A, Du B, Sun Q, Cao T, Zhang Z
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in college students.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and twenty newly admitted college students were enrolled. The Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot assay (ELISPOT) was used. Overall, 171 students with ELISPOT assay+/TST+ were monitored for three years to detect active TB disease.
RESULTS: The overall positive rate of ELISPOT assay was 40.7% among TST+ students. The ELISPOT positive rates were 36.9%, 45.4%, and 64.3% in groups of TST induration of 10-14mm, 15-20mm, and ≥20mm, respectively, with a significant difference (χ(2)=10.136, P<0.01) but no significant difference between BCG scar and no scar (41.2% vs. 38.8%; P>0.05). None of the 171 untreated students contracted active TB within the three-year monitoring period.
CONCLUSION: The LTBI rate might be overestimated by TST compared with interferon-γ release assays. On the basis of a close monitoring, few students developed active TB despite a positive result to the TST and ELISPOT assay.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and twenty newly admitted college students were enrolled. The Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot assay (ELISPOT) was used. Overall, 171 students with ELISPOT assay+/TST+ were monitored for three years to detect active TB disease.
RESULTS: The overall positive rate of ELISPOT assay was 40.7% among TST+ students. The ELISPOT positive rates were 36.9%, 45.4%, and 64.3% in groups of TST induration of 10-14mm, 15-20mm, and ≥20mm, respectively, with a significant difference (χ(2)=10.136, P<0.01) but no significant difference between BCG scar and no scar (41.2% vs. 38.8%; P>0.05). None of the 171 untreated students contracted active TB within the three-year monitoring period.
CONCLUSION: The LTBI rate might be overestimated by TST compared with interferon-γ release assays. On the basis of a close monitoring, few students developed active TB despite a positive result to the TST and ELISPOT assay.