Arerugi = [Allergy] · 2017
[IPRATROPIUM BROMIDE FOR ACUTE ASTHMA IN CHILDREN: A RETROSPECTIVE TRIAL].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nomura Osamu, Morikawa Yoshihiko, Hagiwara Yusuke, Ihara Takateru, Inoue Nobuaki, Sakakibara Hiroshi, Akasawa Akira
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Inhaled anticholinergics such as ipratropium bromide (IB), when administered with β2-agonists, are effective in reducing hospital admissions of children presenting to the emergency department with moderate to severe asthma. However, treatment of acute asthma with IB is still uncommon in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of IB for the treatment of pediatric acute asthma.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the admission rate of patients who received IB with those who did not. Patients aged 4 years or older with a history of moderate to severe attacks were included. For analysis, propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding factors related to IB use. Patients received IB by metered-dose inhaler (40μg per dose) with a spacer three times at 20-min intervals.
RESULTS: Among 175 patients included in the analysis, 102 patients were treated with IB (IB group) and 73 patients were treated without IB (Non-IB group). A propensity score matching analysis extracted 63 patients from each group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of admission rate (IB group 12.7% vs Non-IB group 9.5%; p=0.78). One patient (1.0%) treated with IB experienced dryness of the mouth, which resolved spontaneously.
CONCLUSIONS: The admission rate did not decline with IB use. Several confounding factors could have influenced and limited our results. A prospective study is needed to investigate the effectiveness of IB in Japan.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the admission rate of patients who received IB with those who did not. Patients aged 4 years or older with a history of moderate to severe attacks were included. For analysis, propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding factors related to IB use. Patients received IB by metered-dose inhaler (40μg per dose) with a spacer three times at 20-min intervals.
RESULTS: Among 175 patients included in the analysis, 102 patients were treated with IB (IB group) and 73 patients were treated without IB (Non-IB group). A propensity score matching analysis extracted 63 patients from each group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of admission rate (IB group 12.7% vs Non-IB group 9.5%; p=0.78). One patient (1.0%) treated with IB experienced dryness of the mouth, which resolved spontaneously.
CONCLUSIONS: The admission rate did not decline with IB use. Several confounding factors could have influenced and limited our results. A prospective study is needed to investigate the effectiveness of IB in Japan.