Medicina clinica · 2011
[Comparative performance of QuantiFERON(®)-TB Gold IT versus tuberculin skin test among contact investigations for latent tuberculosis infection].
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Delgado Naranjo Jesús, Castells Carrillo Concha, García Calabuig Miguel Ángel, Sáez López Inmaculada, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo para el estudio de los IGRAS en Bizkaia y Araba (GTIBA)
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Until recently, the only tool for detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTI) was the tuberculin skin test (PPD). QuantiFERON(®)-TB Gold In-Tube (QF), as well as other Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), appears to be an alternative or adjunct to the PPD. The goal of the study was to compare QF with PPD to evaluate de accuracy of QF for routinely identifying LTI in contact investigations.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed a descriptive and prospective study with contacts of culture-confirmed tuberculosis source cases in Bizkaia and Araba from May 2007 through February 2008 who underwent QF and PPD. Concordance between both tests was analyzed using the kappa statistic (κ).
RESULTS: 376 contacts were found: 8 were high-risk children (age < 15), 30 low-medium risk children, 46 high-risk adults (age>14) and 270 low-medium risk adults. PPD was positive in 160 subjects (42.5%) at PPD ≥ 5mm, 141 (37.5%) at PPD ≥ 10mm and 95 (25.3%) at PPD ≥ 15 mm. In QF analysis 94 subjects were positive, 279 negative and 3 indeterminate. Overall agreement between QF and PPD was good at PPD ≥ 10mm (κ=0.53; p<0.0001) but agreement was poor when the index case had positive baciloscopy at PPD ≥ 5mm (κ=0.28; p<0.001) and high-risk contacts at PPD ≥ 15 mm (κ=0.048; p=0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: IGRAs are an accurate indicator of LTI, providing a more specific way of diagnostic and reducing the number of subjects to be treated. QF appears to be a valuable public health tool with potential advantages over the PPD and improving resources.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed a descriptive and prospective study with contacts of culture-confirmed tuberculosis source cases in Bizkaia and Araba from May 2007 through February 2008 who underwent QF and PPD. Concordance between both tests was analyzed using the kappa statistic (κ).
RESULTS: 376 contacts were found: 8 were high-risk children (age < 15), 30 low-medium risk children, 46 high-risk adults (age>14) and 270 low-medium risk adults. PPD was positive in 160 subjects (42.5%) at PPD ≥ 5mm, 141 (37.5%) at PPD ≥ 10mm and 95 (25.3%) at PPD ≥ 15 mm. In QF analysis 94 subjects were positive, 279 negative and 3 indeterminate. Overall agreement between QF and PPD was good at PPD ≥ 10mm (κ=0.53; p<0.0001) but agreement was poor when the index case had positive baciloscopy at PPD ≥ 5mm (κ=0.28; p<0.001) and high-risk contacts at PPD ≥ 15 mm (κ=0.048; p=0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: IGRAs are an accurate indicator of LTI, providing a more specific way of diagnostic and reducing the number of subjects to be treated. QF appears to be a valuable public health tool with potential advantages over the PPD and improving resources.