The European respiratory journal · 2010
Diagnosing TB infection in children: analysis of discordances using in vitro tests and the tuberculin skin test.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Altet-Gómez N, De Souza-Galvao M, Latorre I, Milà C, Jiménez M A, Solsona J, Cantos A, Zamora J J, Ruiz-Manzano J, Ausina V, Domínguez J
Аннотация
The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of the interferon (IFN)-γ tests (QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-G-IT) and T-SPOT®.TB) with the tuberculin skin test (TST) in diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) infection in children, and to analyse discordant results. This was a prospective study including 98 children from contact-tracing studies and 68 children with TST indurations ≥ 5 mm recruited during public health screenings. Positive IFN-γ tests results were associated with risk of exposure (p<0.0001). T-SPOT.TB was positive in 11 (78.6%) out of 14 cases with active TB and QFT-G-IT in nine (64.3%) out of 14 cases. Sensitised T-cells against Mycobacterium avium were detected in six out of 12 children not vaccinated with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), a TST induration 5-9 mm in diameter and both IFN-γ tests negative. In concordant IFN-γ tests results, a positive correlation was found (p = 0.0001) between the number of responding cells and the amount of IFN-γ released. However, in discordant IFN-γ tests results this correlation was negative (p = 0.371): an increase in the number of spot-forming cells correlated with a decrease in the amount of IFN-γ released. The use of IFN-γ tests is helpful for the diagnosis of TB infection, avoiding cross-reactions with BCG immunisation and nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. The analysis of highly discordant results requires further investigation to elucidate possible clinical implications.