Atencion primaria · 1995
[Utilization of visits and analysis of the impact of programmed visits].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Royo Serrano M, Arto Serrano A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To discover the characteristics of the use of consultations with regards to frequency of, and reasons for, attendance. To measure the repercussion on on-demand attendance of including patients with chronic pathologies in the appointments system.
PATIENTS: Two samples of clinical histories were extracted at random from two general medical lists; one sample of 125 histories in order to determine the characteristics of the previous year's consultations; another of 44 histories where the patient had used the appointments system, in order to quantify the attendances for one year before and one after their inclusion in the system.
DESIGN: A descriptive retrospective study.
SETTING: Fuentes Norte Health Centre (Zaragoza).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The average of consultations per inhabitant per year was 3.7.4.8% attended_11 times. Women attended more than men (4.8 times as against 2.6; p < 0.0005), as did those over 65 (6.9 times; p < 0.0005). The main reasons for an on-demand consultation were bureaucratic (20%) and acute respiratory infections (16.3%); and for consultation with appointment, Hypertension (35.3%) and Obesity (32.8%). The average of on-demand consultations went down from 6.3 to 3.5 (p < 0.0001) on introducing the patients into the appointments system; but the overall number of consultations for these patients went up from 6.3 to 10.5 (p < 0.0001) because of the general medical and nursing appointments.
CONCLUSIONS: We must limit unnecessary bureaucratic requests and encourage self-care. The efficacy of scheduled consultations must be analysed; and those attending must be identified and dealt with.
PATIENTS: Two samples of clinical histories were extracted at random from two general medical lists; one sample of 125 histories in order to determine the characteristics of the previous year's consultations; another of 44 histories where the patient had used the appointments system, in order to quantify the attendances for one year before and one after their inclusion in the system.
DESIGN: A descriptive retrospective study.
SETTING: Fuentes Norte Health Centre (Zaragoza).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The average of consultations per inhabitant per year was 3.7.4.8% attended_11 times. Women attended more than men (4.8 times as against 2.6; p < 0.0005), as did those over 65 (6.9 times; p < 0.0005). The main reasons for an on-demand consultation were bureaucratic (20%) and acute respiratory infections (16.3%); and for consultation with appointment, Hypertension (35.3%) and Obesity (32.8%). The average of on-demand consultations went down from 6.3 to 3.5 (p < 0.0001) on introducing the patients into the appointments system; but the overall number of consultations for these patients went up from 6.3 to 10.5 (p < 0.0001) because of the general medical and nursing appointments.
CONCLUSIONS: We must limit unnecessary bureaucratic requests and encourage self-care. The efficacy of scheduled consultations must be analysed; and those attending must be identified and dealt with.