Australasian emergency care · 2024
Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ryan Kimberley, Jones Lee, Cass Sherry, Christensen Jacob, Appleyard Mark, Brown Anthony Ft, Grimpen Florian
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). Study aims were to evaluate the utility of the Australasian Triage Score (ATS) in patients presenting to the ED with UGIB.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 356 patients over a 2-year period who presented to a metropolitan hospital ED. The ATS was categorised into three groups, ATS 1/2, ATS 3 and ATS 4/5. Primary outcomes explored the relationship between ATS and haemodynamic parameters. Secondary outcomes evaluated the proportion of patients with suspected variceal bleeding and allocated a non-life-threatening ATS category.
RESULTS: The study population were distributed by ATS 1/2 (28.7 %), ATS 3 (46.6 %) and ATS 4/5 (24.7 %). Over half of patients with some haemodynamic compromise were allocated an ATS 3 or 4/5. Additionally, 56 % with suspected variceal bleeding and 51 % with syncope were also allocated an ATS category (3 or 4/5).
CONCLUSIONS: The utility of the ATS recognises most patients presenting with UGIB at high-risk of adverse outcomes. Additional screening at triage maybe beneficial for those patients with a history of cirrhosis or varices, and UGIB-related syncope. Consideration of an ATS category of 2 for these patients may enable them to access earlier time-critical therapies.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 356 patients over a 2-year period who presented to a metropolitan hospital ED. The ATS was categorised into three groups, ATS 1/2, ATS 3 and ATS 4/5. Primary outcomes explored the relationship between ATS and haemodynamic parameters. Secondary outcomes evaluated the proportion of patients with suspected variceal bleeding and allocated a non-life-threatening ATS category.
RESULTS: The study population were distributed by ATS 1/2 (28.7 %), ATS 3 (46.6 %) and ATS 4/5 (24.7 %). Over half of patients with some haemodynamic compromise were allocated an ATS 3 or 4/5. Additionally, 56 % with suspected variceal bleeding and 51 % with syncope were also allocated an ATS category (3 or 4/5).
CONCLUSIONS: The utility of the ATS recognises most patients presenting with UGIB at high-risk of adverse outcomes. Additional screening at triage maybe beneficial for those patients with a history of cirrhosis or varices, and UGIB-related syncope. Consideration of an ATS category of 2 for these patients may enable them to access earlier time-critical therapies.