Impact of lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor on treatment response in pulmonary exacerbations of F508del/F508del cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF). Although the combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor have been shown to reduce PEx frequency, their influence on clinical and biochemical responses to acute PEx treatment is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of STOP2, a large multicenter randomized controlled trial of antimicrobial treatment durations for adult PWCF presenting with PEx. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes in antibiotic-treated F508del/F508del PWCF receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor with those observed in antibiotic-treated F508del/F508del controls not receiving CFTR modulator therapy. The primary outcome measure was the change in percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) following completion of intravenous (IV) antibiotics, with post-antibiotic changes in symptoms, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and weight included as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Among 982 PEx events in randomized PWCF, 480 were homozygous for F508del, of whom 289 were receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor at initiation of antibiotic therapy. Modulator-treated F508del/F508del PWCF did not demonstrate greater improvements in ppFEV1, symptoms, serum CRP or weight following antibiotic treatment compared to modulator-naïve controls matched for age, sex, baseline ppFEV1, genotype, body mass index, initial CRP, initial symptoms, exacerbation history, diabetic status, randomization arm and concomitant medical therapy.

CONCLUSION

In the acute setting, CFTR modulator therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor does not convey additional clinical or biochemical advantage above standardized PEx treatment in F508del/F508del PWCF.