Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
A prospective randomized tandem gastroscopy pilot study of linked color imaging versus white light imaging for detection of upper gastrointestinal lesions.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Clement Chun Ho, Namasivayam Vikneswaran, Li James Weiquan, Khor Chris Jl, Fock Kwong Ming, Law Ngai Moh, Wang Lai Mun, Ang Tiing Leong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal (GI) lesions may have subtle morphological changes. Linked color imaging (LCI) combines narrow-band wavelength light and white light imaging (WLI) in appropriate balance to enhance lesion detection. We compared the detection rates of upper GI lesions using LCI and WLI.
METHOD: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tandem gastroscopy with WLI inspection followed by LCI, or vice versa. Endoscopic examination was performed using the EG-L590ZW gastroscope and the LASEREO endoscope system (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan). Histology was reported by a specialist GI pathologist blinded to the technique of lesion detection and was used as the gold standard for diagnosis.
RESULTS: Ninety patients (mean age 66.8 years, 51.5% male patients) were randomized to either LCI examination first followed by WLI (LCI-WLI), or vice versa (WLI-LCI). An 18.9% of gastroscopies in the study were for surveillance of previously known gastric cancer precursors. Ten patients (11.1%) had a history of Helicobacter pylori infection. There was no significant difference in the time taken for examination under LCI (311 ± 96 s) and WLI (342 ± 86 s) (P = 0.700). LCI detection rates were higher than WLI detection rates for gastric cancer precursors such as atrophic gastritis (2.19% vs 0.55%) (P < 0.01) and intestinal metaplasia (19.73% vs 7.67%) (P < 0.01). Both sensitivity (82.74% vs 50.96%) and specificity (98.71% vs 96.10%) of LCI were higher than WLI for detection of upper GI lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Linked color imaging had better detection rates, sensitivity, and specificity for detection of upper GI lesions compared with WLI.
METHOD: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tandem gastroscopy with WLI inspection followed by LCI, or vice versa. Endoscopic examination was performed using the EG-L590ZW gastroscope and the LASEREO endoscope system (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan). Histology was reported by a specialist GI pathologist blinded to the technique of lesion detection and was used as the gold standard for diagnosis.
RESULTS: Ninety patients (mean age 66.8 years, 51.5% male patients) were randomized to either LCI examination first followed by WLI (LCI-WLI), or vice versa (WLI-LCI). An 18.9% of gastroscopies in the study were for surveillance of previously known gastric cancer precursors. Ten patients (11.1%) had a history of Helicobacter pylori infection. There was no significant difference in the time taken for examination under LCI (311 ± 96 s) and WLI (342 ± 86 s) (P = 0.700). LCI detection rates were higher than WLI detection rates for gastric cancer precursors such as atrophic gastritis (2.19% vs 0.55%) (P < 0.01) and intestinal metaplasia (19.73% vs 7.67%) (P < 0.01). Both sensitivity (82.74% vs 50.96%) and specificity (98.71% vs 96.10%) of LCI were higher than WLI for detection of upper GI lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Linked color imaging had better detection rates, sensitivity, and specificity for detection of upper GI lesions compared with WLI.