Archives of medical research · 2020
COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hellmann Fernando, Williams-Jones Bryn, Garrafa Volnei
Аннотация
A TV debate in April 2020 between two French doctors regarding the benefits of testing a coronavirus vaccine in Africa where there are no masks or treatments available has led to international criticism. This case highlights a problematic ethical double standard in multinational clinical research: trials that would be considered unethical in high income countries (e.g., placebo-controlled where there is an existing treatment) are nonetheless justified in low-and-middle-income countries because the existing standards of care are less (i.e., no access to a treatment). Underlying this ethical double standard in some multinational clinical trials is a moral imperialism and persistent colonialist thinking that must be rejected.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AfricaBetacoronavirusCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicColonialismCoronavirus InfectionsDeveloping CountriesEthical RelativismEthics, ResearchFranceHuman ExperimentationHumansMoral ObligationsPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralResearch SubjectsSARS-CoV-2Viral Vaccines