International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2020
Positive predictive value for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cholesteatoma: A retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hervochon Rémi, Elmaleh-Berges Monique, Francois Martine, Marhic Alix, Bahakim Abdullah, Teissier Natacha, Abbeele Thierry Van Den
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were first to calculate the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of DW-MRI to detect cholesteatoma and then to analyze false positives.
METHODS: All temporal bone MRI with DWI sequences performed in our pediatric university hospital between 2005 and 2015 were included retrospectively. 46 patients with a cholesteatoma diagnosis on the MRI report and who underwent surgery were studied.
RESULTS: The number of DW-MRI for identification of cholesteatoma has grown in ten years. We calculated an 89% Positive Predictive Value. DW-MRI sensitivities were 100.0% and 70.7% for respectively keratin and squamous epithelium.
CONCLUSION: DW-MRI hypersignal is not synonymous of cholesteatoma diagnosis. Indeed, this diagnosis relies on the importance of a proper otoscopic examination, a suggestive medical history, CT scan data and analysis of other MRI sequences, including T1-weighted sequence, to rule out other etiologies of middle ear DW-MRI hypersignal.
METHODS: All temporal bone MRI with DWI sequences performed in our pediatric university hospital between 2005 and 2015 were included retrospectively. 46 patients with a cholesteatoma diagnosis on the MRI report and who underwent surgery were studied.
RESULTS: The number of DW-MRI for identification of cholesteatoma has grown in ten years. We calculated an 89% Positive Predictive Value. DW-MRI sensitivities were 100.0% and 70.7% for respectively keratin and squamous epithelium.
CONCLUSION: DW-MRI hypersignal is not synonymous of cholesteatoma diagnosis. Indeed, this diagnosis relies on the importance of a proper otoscopic examination, a suggestive medical history, CT scan data and analysis of other MRI sequences, including T1-weighted sequence, to rule out other etiologies of middle ear DW-MRI hypersignal.