MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110416

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2020

Positive predictive value for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cholesteatoma: A retrospective study.

Hervochon Rémi, Elmaleh-Berges Monique, Francois Martine, Marhic Alix, Bahakim Abdullah, Teissier Natacha, Abbeele Thierry Van Den

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were first to calculate the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of DW-MRI to detect cholesteatoma and then to analyze false positives.

METHODS

All temporal bone MRI with DWI sequences performed in our pediatric university hospital between 2005 and 2015 were included retrospectively. 46 patients with a cholesteatoma diagnosis on the MRI report and who underwent surgery were studied.

RESULTS

The number of DW-MRI for identification of cholesteatoma has grown in ten years. We calculated an 89% Positive Predictive Value. DW-MRI sensitivities were 100.0% and 70.7% for respectively keratin and squamous epithelium.

CONCLUSION

DW-MRI hypersignal is not synonymous of cholesteatoma diagnosis. Indeed, this diagnosis relies on the importance of a proper otoscopic examination, a suggestive medical history, CT scan data and analysis of other MRI sequences, including T1-weighted sequence, to rule out other etiologies of middle ear DW-MRI hypersignal.

Для цитирования: Hervochon Rémi, Elmaleh-Berges Monique, Francois Martine, Marhic Alix, Bahakim Abdullah, Teissier Natacha, Abbeele Thierry Van Den. Positive predictive value for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cholesteatoma: A retrospective study.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110416.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.