MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0306312710391923

Медицинская библиотека · Social studies of science · 2011

Genomic designation: how genetics can delineate new, phenotypically diffuse medical categories.

Navon Daniel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This paper reports and discusses 'genomic designation' as a way of classifying people. In genomic designation the object of biomedical analysis--and the concomitant medical category that is subject to scientific, clinical, and social action--is delineated on a genomic basis, while the phenotype is decentralized and tabulated post factum. Unlike prominent sociological concepts such as biosociality or geneticization, where genetic proclivities for or explanations of phenotypic categories affect social processes, genomic designation treats characteristics of the genome as the essential referent of new categories of illness. I outline the relevant sociological literature and the shift to what Nikolas Rose has called the 'molecular gaze' before explicating the concept ofgenomic designation and its half-century history. I use 22q13 Deletion/Phelan-McDermid syndrome as an example of genomic designation: investigations into the deletion of genetic material at site q13 on the 22nd chromosome preceded and made practicable the delineation of a syndrome more than a decade later, even though the associated phenotype is not distinct enough for diagnosis. Finally, I discuss the implications of this turn to 'rigidly designate' kinds of people according to observations made at the level of the genome and outline directions for future research.

Для цитирования: Navon Daniel. Genomic designation: how genetics can delineate new, phenotypically diffuse medical categories.. Social studies of science. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0306312710391923.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.