MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2000

[Importance of allergologic consultation after a ++perianesthetic complication. Report on a year of activities at the Poitiers University Hospital Center].

Breuil K, Remblier C, Meurice J C

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Patients who present an accident during general anesthesia must be tested 4 to 8 weeks later in order to determine the exact cause and prevent any further acute accidents. We report the results of a prospective study based on a 1-year period of allergology consultations after peroperative accidents in the Poitiers University Hospital.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Previous history, surgical procedure, the nature and gravity, of the reaction, risk factors and tests results were recorded. All observations were transmitted to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center. The level of causality of the administered drug was determined from these data which were integrated into the national computer bank of side effects.

RESULTS

After 2,500 general anesthesia procedures, a total of 21 patients had been referred to the allergology consultation. Eighteen were positive for at least 1 test (skin tests or laboratory tests). Among the substances administered, causality was probable for 16, possible for 4 and doubtful for 1.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate the importance of allergy tests and the need for close collaboration between anesthetists, allergologists and pharmacologists.

Для цитирования: Breuil K, Remblier C, Meurice J C. [Importance of allergologic consultation after a ++perianesthetic complication. Report on a year of activities at the Poitiers University Hospital Center].. Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983). 2000.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.