Journal of vascular surgery · 2001
Results of endovascular superficial femoral endarterectomy.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nelson P R, Powell R J, Proia R R, Schermerhorn M L, Fillinger M F, Zwolak R M, Walsh D B, Cronenwett J L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Endovascular superficial femoral artery (SFA) endarterectomy with a ring stripper/cutter and distal stenting has been suggested to have a patency comparable with above-knee bypass surgery. We report our initial experience with this technique.
METHODS: Seventeen patients (13 men and 4 women; mean age, 64 years) with SFA occlusion and above-knee popliteal reconstitution underwent attempted remote endarterectomy with a ring cutter system combined with primary stenting of the distal end point. Analysis was performed in a prospective manner with patency rates determined by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis.
RESULTS: The indication for operation was claudication in 8 patients, rest pain in 6, and tissue loss in 3. Initial technical success was achieved in 11 patients (65%). Reasons for technical failure included SFA perforation (4), inability to traverse a calcified/diseased segment (1), and inability to retract/remove the ring cutter (1). Life-table analysis of all patients revealed a primary patency at 1 year of 26% +/- 11%. Primary-assisted patency was 38% +/- 12% at 1 year, with 59% of patients ultimately requiring surgical bypass grafting. In patients in whom initial technical success was achieved, the 1-year primary and primary-assisted patency rates were 40% and 59%, respectively. There were four reocclusions requiring surgical revascularization with below-knee popliteal (2) or tibial (2) bypass grafting, 1 symptomatic restenosis requiring repeat angioplasty, and 1 symptomatic restenosis treated conservatively.
CONCLUSION: The results of endovascular SFA endarterectomy were disappointing, with technical success in less than two thirds of patients and a 1-year primary patency of only 26%. Remote SFA endarterectomy appears less effective than above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting, and after early failure, patients may require more distal revascularization for limb salvage.
METHODS: Seventeen patients (13 men and 4 women; mean age, 64 years) with SFA occlusion and above-knee popliteal reconstitution underwent attempted remote endarterectomy with a ring cutter system combined with primary stenting of the distal end point. Analysis was performed in a prospective manner with patency rates determined by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis.
RESULTS: The indication for operation was claudication in 8 patients, rest pain in 6, and tissue loss in 3. Initial technical success was achieved in 11 patients (65%). Reasons for technical failure included SFA perforation (4), inability to traverse a calcified/diseased segment (1), and inability to retract/remove the ring cutter (1). Life-table analysis of all patients revealed a primary patency at 1 year of 26% +/- 11%. Primary-assisted patency was 38% +/- 12% at 1 year, with 59% of patients ultimately requiring surgical bypass grafting. In patients in whom initial technical success was achieved, the 1-year primary and primary-assisted patency rates were 40% and 59%, respectively. There were four reocclusions requiring surgical revascularization with below-knee popliteal (2) or tibial (2) bypass grafting, 1 symptomatic restenosis requiring repeat angioplasty, and 1 symptomatic restenosis treated conservatively.
CONCLUSION: The results of endovascular SFA endarterectomy were disappointing, with technical success in less than two thirds of patients and a 1-year primary patency of only 26%. Remote SFA endarterectomy appears less effective than above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting, and after early failure, patients may require more distal revascularization for limb salvage.