DOI 10.1016/j.neuchi.2026.101875
Intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgical oncology: A national survey of French practices, benefits, and limitations.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the patterns of use, perceived benefits, limitations, and needs related to intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in neurosurgical oncology practice in France.
METHODS
A structured 24-item questionnaire was distributed to members of the French Neurosurgical Society (Club de Neuro-Oncologie - Société Française de Neurochirurgie). The survey explored demographics, IOUS usage patterns in cranial and spine tumor surgery, perceived utility, limitations, integration with neuronavigation, training, and interest in future research.
RESULTS
108 neurosurgeons, predominantly from high-volume academic centers, completed the survey. IOUS was widely used for gliomas, metastases, and intramedullary tumors, primarily for lesion localization and residual tumor assessment. It was often combined with MRI-based neuronavigation. The highest perceived benefits were for tumor boundary delineation (mean 3.64 ± 1.02) and improved resection quality (mean 3.26 ± 1.08), while vascular assessment was rated lower (mean 2.02 ± 1.07). Main limitations included insufficient image quality (52.8%) and technical constraints (30.6%). Despite limited formal training (96.3%), most respondents expressed interest in dedicated IOUS training (85.2%) and multicenter studies (90.7%).
CONCLUSION
IOUS is widely adopted in neurosurgical oncology and perceived as useful for improving tumor resection. Its benefits vary with surgical experience, and current limitations are primarily technical and educational. Future advancements and structured training may enhance its utility.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.