MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.117151

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2026

Prevalence and predictors of low-acuity interfacility transfer in minimal injury severity geriatric trauma patients.

Mahajan Arnav, Hafiz Priyash, Shin Jiwook, Bellampalli Avaneesh, West Emma, Podugu Pooja, Dvorak Justin, Ho Vanessa P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Interfacility transfer (IFT) may expose older adults to potentially unnecessary care transitions.

METHODS

Using ACS TQIP data (2019-2022), we identified patients aged ≥65 years with Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≤9. Low-acuity transfer required no ICU admission, ventilation, early transfusion, stay >48 h, or unfavorable disposition. Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity was summarized by body region.

RESULTS

Among 207,875 patients, 54,236 (26.1%) underwent transfer, of whom 7713 (14.2%) met low-acuity criteria. Younger age, male sex, and non-fall mechanism predicted low-acuity transfer; payer disparities persisted. Serious head injury was equally common across acuity groups (head AIS ≥3, 5.8% each), whereas severe lower-extremity injury was less frequent in low-acuity transfers (3.3% vs 25.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Many geriatric transfers involve minimal resource use; while many are clinically justified, this underscores the need for validated, age-specific triage tools incorporating injury phenotype to guide transfer decisions.

Для цитирования: Mahajan Arnav, Hafiz Priyash, Shin Jiwook, Bellampalli Avaneesh, West Emma, Podugu Pooja, Dvorak Justin, Ho Vanessa P. Prevalence and predictors of low-acuity interfacility transfer in minimal injury severity geriatric trauma patients.. American journal of surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.117151.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.