MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1010539517753931

Медицинская библиотека · Asia-Pacific journal of public health · 2018

Inconsistent Condom Use Among Male University Students in Northern Thailand.

Pinyaphong Jakkrite, Srithanaviboonchai Kriengkrai, Chariyalertsak Suwat, Phornphibul Pikul, Tangmunkongvorakul Arunrat, Musumari Patou Masika

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

University students are at increased risk of HIV infection, but little is known about the determinants of inconsistent condom use among them. The study aims to assess the association of sociodemographic, individual, dyadic, and social factors with inconsistent condom use among male university students. Of 1091 participants, 67.0% had sexual intercourse, though 64.4% had inconsistent condom use. It was found that "did not use a condom at first sexual intercourse" (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 6.1; CI, 3.7-10.1), "history of STIs" (AOR, 2.1; CI, 1.0-4.2), low "self-efficacy" (AOR, 2.4; CI, 1.3-4.7), "perception that condom use reduces pleasure" (AOR, 1.4; CI, 1.0-2.1), and "high subjective norm" (AOR, 1.9; CI, 1.3-2.8) were associated with increased odds of inconsistent condom use. Condom use should be promoted from the onset of sexual activity to establish a habit of safe sex practices and for improvement in self-efficacy of condom use. Emphasis must be laid on pleasure-enhancing benefits of condom use and changing social norms.

Для цитирования: Pinyaphong Jakkrite, Srithanaviboonchai Kriengkrai, Chariyalertsak Suwat, Phornphibul Pikul, Tangmunkongvorakul Arunrat, Musumari Patou Masika. Inconsistent Condom Use Among Male University Students in Northern Thailand.. Asia-Pacific journal of public health. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1010539517753931.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.