MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/07448481.2015.1085054

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2016

Lights, camera, condoms! Assessing college men's attitudes toward condom use in pornography.

Kraus Shane W, Rosenberg Harold

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Investigate male college students' attitudes toward actors' use of condoms in pornography.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred thirteen undergraduate males attending a large, state-supported midwestern university in the fall semester, 2012.

METHODS

Using a Web-based procedure, participants completed questionnaires assessing their pornography use, sexual history characteristics, and their attitudes toward condom use by adult performers.

RESULTS

Factor analysis of the 11-item condom use attitudes questionnaire supported 2 distinct subscales: Condom Supportive Attitudes and Condom Critical Attitudes. Although participants typically agreed with statements supportive of condom use and generally disagreed with statements critical of condom use in pornography, gay men had significantly higher condom supportive subscale scores than did heterosexual men. Neither subscale was correlated with weekly viewing of pornography.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some producers of adult films argue that actors wearing condoms will displease many viewers, current findings suggest that young men express support for use of condoms by pornographic film actors.

Для цитирования: Kraus Shane W, Rosenberg Harold. Lights, camera, condoms! Assessing college men's attitudes toward condom use in pornography.. Journal of American college health : J of ACH. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1085054.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.