Acta neurochirurgica · 2026
Dangers of orbital retraction in transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery.
СтатьяОбзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Agarwal Ayushi, Tong Jessica Y, Selva Dinesh
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This review summarizes the risks associated with orbital retraction in transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery (TONES) and proposes practical strategies to optimize surgical freedom while preserving visual function.
METHODS: A qualitative review synthesized through a systematic literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE) database. Studies involving human or cadaveric TONES and endoscopic transorbital approaches were reviewed.
RESULTS: Ten studies met inclusion criteria, comprising cadaveric as well as human subjects. Virtual-reality and cadaveric models revealed that 10-11 mm of globe displacement provides adequate surgical freedom, whereas sustained retraction beyond approximately 15 mm results in steep rises in intraocular and intra-orbital pressure posing a higher risk of orbital compartment syndrome. Clinical reports link prolonged retraction to transient or permanent mydriasis, ocular hypotony, decompression retinopathy, and visual loss.
CONCLUSION: Orbital retraction is central to TONES but is the principal driver of ocular morbidity. Based on the available evidence, retraction should be dynamic, gentle, and intermittent, with globe displacement generally limited to 10-12 mm. Apex-directed focal pressure should be avoided, and continuous monitoring of pupil and intraocular pressure is essential. Multidisciplinary protocols are recommended to standardize safe retraction practices while preserving the advantages of TONES.
METHODS: A qualitative review synthesized through a systematic literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE) database. Studies involving human or cadaveric TONES and endoscopic transorbital approaches were reviewed.
RESULTS: Ten studies met inclusion criteria, comprising cadaveric as well as human subjects. Virtual-reality and cadaveric models revealed that 10-11 mm of globe displacement provides adequate surgical freedom, whereas sustained retraction beyond approximately 15 mm results in steep rises in intraocular and intra-orbital pressure posing a higher risk of orbital compartment syndrome. Clinical reports link prolonged retraction to transient or permanent mydriasis, ocular hypotony, decompression retinopathy, and visual loss.
CONCLUSION: Orbital retraction is central to TONES but is the principal driver of ocular morbidity. Based on the available evidence, retraction should be dynamic, gentle, and intermittent, with globe displacement generally limited to 10-12 mm. Apex-directed focal pressure should be avoided, and continuous monitoring of pupil and intraocular pressure is essential. Multidisciplinary protocols are recommended to standardize safe retraction practices while preserving the advantages of TONES.