Desmopressin (DDAVP) use in patients with von Willebrand disease: A single-centre retrospective review of test response and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Peri-procedural management of von Willebrand disease (VWD) utilizes von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates or desmopressin (DDAVP) to increase VWF levels. DDAVP is safe, easily administered, and inexpensive. Currently, a consensus definition for adequate DDAVP response is lacking, and outcomes of peri-procedural DDAVP use in VWD patients are seldom reported.

AIM: This single-centre retrospective review aims to characterize DDAVP-responsiveness and assess clinical outcomes of peri-procedural DDAVP use in VWD.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We reviewed records for all our adult VWD patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent DDAVP challenge testing between January 2007 and January 2022. DDAVP-responsiveness was assessed using six definitions. Bleeding outcomes following procedures covered by DDAVP were classified as excessive or expected bleeding.

RESULTS

Eighty-four of 94 (89.4%) patients were DDAVP-responsive by our definition (1-h VWF Activity/Factor VIII ≥0.50 IU/mL). However, the proportion of DDAVP-responders varied from 53.2% to 91.5%, depending on the literature definition used. Ninety-nine procedures pre-treated with DDAVP were performed during the study period. Eighty-six (86.7%) procedures (31 major; 55 minor) were covered with only DDAVP ± tranexamic acid (TXA). Excessive bleeding occurred following 4/31 major procedures and 2/55 minor procedures (both performed in a single patient with a bleeding score of 16). When covered with DDAVP+Factor ± TXA, one each of 10 major and 3 minor procedures (performed in 2 patients with bleeding scores 15-16) resulted in post-procedural bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-procedural DDAVP prophylaxis appears to be effective among individuals with VWD. Beyond DDAVP-responsiveness, patient bleeding history and procedure invasiveness should be considered in determining suitability for DDAVP prophylaxis.