Journal of pediatric surgery · 2020
Contemporary practice and perceptions surrounding the management of asymptomatic umbilical hernias in children: A survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hills-Dunlap Jonathan L, Anandalwar Seema P, Kashtan Mark A, Graham Dionne A, Rangel Shawn J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To explore variation in perceptions regarding the natural history of asymptomatic umbilical hernias, and to characterize the influence of clinical and nonclinical factors on decision-making surrounding timing of repair.
METHODS: This was a survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. Branching logic and Likert scale questions were used to explore perceptions surrounding natural history (risk of complications and likelihood of spontaneous closure), preferred age for repair, and influence of anatomic, caregiver, sociodemographic, and biological factors on operative timing.
RESULTS: 44% of members completed the survey (371/846). The most common age respondents would consider elective repair was 3 years (37%), although the majority preferred to wait until 4 or 5 years (54%). Most respondents estimated a <1% risk of complications for unrepaired defects, and much greater variability was found in the perceived likelihood of spontaneous closure over time. Decision-making surrounding operative timing was most influenced by anatomic factors (larger defects, proboscoid changes, and interval growth) and parental anxiety surrounding need for emergency surgery, cosmesis, and stigma of parental neglect.
CONCLUSION: Practice and perceptions surrounding management of asymptomatic umbilical hernias vary widely. More robust epidemiological data are needed to define the likelihood of spontaneous closure in the context of age and physical exam findings. Collaborative efforts between surgeons and referring providers are also needed to optimize management of caregiver anxiety and expectations surrounding need for surgical referral and repair.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion).
METHODS: This was a survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. Branching logic and Likert scale questions were used to explore perceptions surrounding natural history (risk of complications and likelihood of spontaneous closure), preferred age for repair, and influence of anatomic, caregiver, sociodemographic, and biological factors on operative timing.
RESULTS: 44% of members completed the survey (371/846). The most common age respondents would consider elective repair was 3 years (37%), although the majority preferred to wait until 4 or 5 years (54%). Most respondents estimated a <1% risk of complications for unrepaired defects, and much greater variability was found in the perceived likelihood of spontaneous closure over time. Decision-making surrounding operative timing was most influenced by anatomic factors (larger defects, proboscoid changes, and interval growth) and parental anxiety surrounding need for emergency surgery, cosmesis, and stigma of parental neglect.
CONCLUSION: Practice and perceptions surrounding management of asymptomatic umbilical hernias vary widely. More robust epidemiological data are needed to define the likelihood of spontaneous closure in the context of age and physical exam findings. Collaborative efforts between surgeons and referring providers are also needed to optimize management of caregiver anxiety and expectations surrounding need for surgical referral and repair.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion).