The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2015
The Surgical Apgar Score in esophagectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Janowak Christopher F, Blasberg Justin D, Taylor Lauren, Maloney James D, Macke Ryan A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The Surgical Apgar Score is a validated prognostic tool that is based on select intraoperative variables (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and blood loss). It has been shown to be a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality in a variety of surgical populations. Esophagectomy for malignancy represents a unique subset of patients at high risk for postoperative complications. This study assessed the ability of a modified esophagectomy Surgical Apgar Score (eSAS) to predict 30-day major morbidity.
METHODS: A retrospective review included 168 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy for malignant disease at the University of Wisconsin from January 2009 through July 2013. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative details, and short-term outcomes were recorded. Primary outcome was 30-day major morbidity. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine associations between predictive variables, eSAS, and major morbidity.
RESULTS: Major morbidity occurred in 35% of cases. Univariate analysis showed that eSAS of 6 or less was strongly associated with major morbidity (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.91; P = .005). Other risk factors included transhiatal technique, body mass index less than 20 or greater than 35 kg/m(2), and history of diabetes mellitus. In multivariate analysis, eSAS of 6 or less remained a strong predictor of postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-8.26; P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The eSAS was strongly associated with 30-day major morbidity after esophagectomy. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether improved outcomes can be achieved with the eSAS for risk-stratified triage and postoperative care modification.
METHODS: A retrospective review included 168 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy for malignant disease at the University of Wisconsin from January 2009 through July 2013. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative details, and short-term outcomes were recorded. Primary outcome was 30-day major morbidity. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine associations between predictive variables, eSAS, and major morbidity.
RESULTS: Major morbidity occurred in 35% of cases. Univariate analysis showed that eSAS of 6 or less was strongly associated with major morbidity (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.91; P = .005). Other risk factors included transhiatal technique, body mass index less than 20 or greater than 35 kg/m(2), and history of diabetes mellitus. In multivariate analysis, eSAS of 6 or less remained a strong predictor of postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-8.26; P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The eSAS was strongly associated with 30-day major morbidity after esophagectomy. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether improved outcomes can be achieved with the eSAS for risk-stratified triage and postoperative care modification.