Variation in practice patterns and resource utilization surrounding management of intussusception at freestanding Children's Hospitals.

PURPOSE: To characterize variation in practice patterns and resource utilization associated with the management of intussusception at Children's Hospitals.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study (1/1/09-6/30/11) of 27 Children's Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System database was performed. Hospitals were compared with regard to their rates of operative management following attempted enema reduction, prophylactic antibiotic utilization, same-day discharge for those successfully managed non-operatively, 48-h readmission rates, and case-related cost and charges.

RESULTS

2544 patients were identified (median: 93 cases/center) with a median age of 17 months. The rate of operation following attempted enema reduction varied significantly across hospitals (overall rate: 21.1%: range: 11%-62.8%; p<0.0001). For patients managed non-operatively, significant variability was found for prophylactic antibiotic utilization (overall rate: 23.3%; range: 1.4%-93.2%; p<0.0001), same-day discharge (overall rate: 15.2%; range: 0%-83.8%; p<0.0001), readmission rates (overall rate: 17.5%; range: 5.3%-32.1%; p<0.0001), treatment-related costs (overall median: $2490; range: $829-$5905; p<0.0001), and charges (overall median: $6350; range: $2497-$10,306; p<0.0001). Variability in costs and charges was even greater when analyzing all patients (operative and non-operative) with intussusception (overall cost median: $2865; range: $1574-$6763; p<0.0001; overall charge median: $7110; range: $3544-$22,097; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Significant variation in practice patterns and resource utilization exists between Children's Hospitals in the management of intussusception. Prospective analysis of practice variation and appropriately risk-adjusted outcomes through a collaborative quality-improvement platform could accelerate the dissemination of best-practice guidelines for optimizing cost-effective care.