The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2013
Effectiveness of the corrective babbling speech treatment program for children with a history of cleft palate or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dobbelsteyn Cindy, Bird Elizabeth Kay-Raining, Parker Jennifer, Griffiths Charlotte, Budden Ashlee, Flood Kristina, Stilson Amie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a phonetic-based, parent-administered treatment to reduce cleft-related speech errors.
DESIGN: Immediate treatment (IT) versus delayed treatment (DT) comparison followed by analysis of gains over approximately 4 months and again after a longer period of treatment for participants in both groups.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen participants with a history of cleft palate or velopharyngeal dysfunction and speech disorder.
INTERVENTION: After training, parents were instructed to conduct daily 10-minute sessions of phonetic drills with their children.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group differences in percent consonants correct (PCC) were compared between those who did and those who did not receive the treatment. Pre- and posttreatment PCC comparisons were made after approximately 4 months of treatment and after termination of treatment.
RESULTS: Participants receiving Corrective Babbling therapy showed significant gains in PCC in limited contexts after 4 months of therapy. However, gains were not significantly greater for the IT versus DT group. Participants who continued with the treatment for longer than 4 months showed the greatest gains in PCC and had significant improvements in all speech contexts assessed. Parents reported satisfaction with the program.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that this treatment shows promise for at least some children with a history of cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction.
DESIGN: Immediate treatment (IT) versus delayed treatment (DT) comparison followed by analysis of gains over approximately 4 months and again after a longer period of treatment for participants in both groups.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen participants with a history of cleft palate or velopharyngeal dysfunction and speech disorder.
INTERVENTION: After training, parents were instructed to conduct daily 10-minute sessions of phonetic drills with their children.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group differences in percent consonants correct (PCC) were compared between those who did and those who did not receive the treatment. Pre- and posttreatment PCC comparisons were made after approximately 4 months of treatment and after termination of treatment.
RESULTS: Participants receiving Corrective Babbling therapy showed significant gains in PCC in limited contexts after 4 months of therapy. However, gains were not significantly greater for the IT versus DT group. Participants who continued with the treatment for longer than 4 months showed the greatest gains in PCC and had significant improvements in all speech contexts assessed. Parents reported satisfaction with the program.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that this treatment shows promise for at least some children with a history of cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction.