MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.01.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric urology · 2011

The first 5-year follow up of distal antegrade continence enema stomas.

Blackburn S C, Fishman J R, Geoghegan N, Dave K, Madden N, Haddad M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: We investigated 5-year results of distal sites for antegrade continence enemas (DACE).

METHODS

Patients with DACE sites placed more than 5 years previously were identified. Details of procedures were obtained. Parents, and patients over 18, were telephoned and asked to answer a standardised questionnaire.

RESULTS

31 patients were identified. Median age at DACE placement was 7 years (range 3-20). Median follow up was 92 months (range 66-145). 22 tubes were placed endoscopically, 7 were placed at open surgery and 2 at laparoscopic surgery. 28 responses to the telephone questionnaire were obtained. Of these, 15 were still using their DACE and 13 had stopped. Of those who had ceased washouts: 7 reported resolution of symptoms, 4 had a colostomy, 1 an ileostomy and 1 patient had abandoned their DACE. In patients using their stoma, washouts took a median of 5 min, with a median time to result of 25 min. 10 patients reported no soiling, 4 monthly and 1 daily soiling. Median satisfaction score was 8/10 (range 1-10/10). 24 (85%) said that they would recommend a DACE.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of 5-year follow up of a series of patients performing DACE washouts. The results are encouraging.

Для цитирования: Blackburn S C, Fishman J R, Geoghegan N, Dave K, Madden N, Haddad M. The first 5-year follow up of distal antegrade continence enema stomas.. Journal of pediatric urology. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.01.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.