Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals · 2013
Aortic valve replacement in over 70- and over 80-year olds: 5-year cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Tom Kai Ming, Sathananthan Janarthanan, Chieng Nicholas, Gamble Greg D, Haydock David A, Ruygrok Peter N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Demand for aortic valve intervention remains high, and together with the recent introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, this motivates a review of surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly recipients.
METHODS: Consecutive patients over 70 years of age having isolated aortic valve replacement during 2007-11 were retrospectively identified and divided into 70-79 and ≥ 80 years age groups for analyses.
RESULTS: 62 octogenarians and 121 septuagenarians were eligible. Among octogenarians, a lower proportion were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class 3-4 (3.2% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.022) and fewer had diabetes (11.3% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.034), but a higher proportion had infective endocarditis (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.012), and EuroSCORE II was higher (4.9% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Despite this, operative mortality was lower in octogenarians (0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.029), although hospital stay (11.7 vs. 8.9 days, p = 0.026) was longer. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95.2%, 90.1%, and 75.3% for octogenarians and 89.2%, 81.7%, and 70.2% for septuagenarians (p = 0.398). Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class 3-4 and the presence of other valvular stenosis or regurgitation were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSION: Octogenarians had lower operative mortality despite a higher predicted risk preoperatively. Other factors beyond age and EuroSCORE, such as frailty, may be important in deciding whether elderly patients should undergo aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: Consecutive patients over 70 years of age having isolated aortic valve replacement during 2007-11 were retrospectively identified and divided into 70-79 and ≥ 80 years age groups for analyses.
RESULTS: 62 octogenarians and 121 septuagenarians were eligible. Among octogenarians, a lower proportion were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class 3-4 (3.2% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.022) and fewer had diabetes (11.3% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.034), but a higher proportion had infective endocarditis (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.012), and EuroSCORE II was higher (4.9% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Despite this, operative mortality was lower in octogenarians (0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.029), although hospital stay (11.7 vs. 8.9 days, p = 0.026) was longer. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95.2%, 90.1%, and 75.3% for octogenarians and 89.2%, 81.7%, and 70.2% for septuagenarians (p = 0.398). Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class 3-4 and the presence of other valvular stenosis or regurgitation were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSION: Octogenarians had lower operative mortality despite a higher predicted risk preoperatively. Other factors beyond age and EuroSCORE, such as frailty, may be important in deciding whether elderly patients should undergo aortic valve replacement.