MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00006982-199414030-00003

Медицинская библиотека · Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 1994

Penetrating eye injuries in young children.

Alfaro D V, Chaudhry N A, Walonker A F, Runyan T, Saito Y, Liggett P E

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Penetrating eye injuries remain an important cause of blindness among children.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive children, nine years of age or younger, were treated for penetrating eye injuries. Twenty-two (73%) of those patients studied were male and 8 (17%) were female. The average age of the patients was 4.6 years. Sharp objects accounted for the majority of injuries (83%). Twenty (66%) eyes required only primary repair and 10 (33%) eyes required secondary lensectomy and vitreous surgery, which was done within 10 days of the primary repair. Length of follow-up ranged from 6 months to 48 months, and 5 patients were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

Visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 13 (72%) of the 18 patients requiring only primary repair. Stereopsis was present in 13 (87%) of these patients. Of those patients that underwent secondary lensectomy with anterior or pars plana vitrectomy, 42% had visual acuity of 20/100 or better. None had stereopsis.

CONCLUSION

Young children with penetrating eye injuries requiring only primary repair may achieve excellent visual recovery, whereas those with traumatic cataract necessitating lensectomy and vitreous surgery have a less favorable outcome because of more severe injury and subsequent amblyopia.

Для цитирования: Alfaro D V, Chaudhry N A, Walonker A F, Runyan T, Saito Y, Liggett P E. Penetrating eye injuries in young children.. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 1994. DOI: 10.1097/00006982-199414030-00003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.