Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France) · 2013
[Measles vaccination campaign for vulnerable populations: lessons learned].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laurence Sophie, Chappuis Marielle, Lucas Dorinela, Duteurtre Martin, Corty Jean-François
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Between 2008 and 2011, a measles epidemic raged in France. Immunization coverage in France, already insufficient in the general population, is even more worrying for deprived populations in whom exposure to the disease and the risk of complications are much higher. In this context, Medecins du Monde (MdM), the General Council of the Seine-Saint-Denis (CG93) and the Territorial Directorate of the Regional Health Agency (DTARS) implemented a measles vaccination campaign among the Rom population of the department.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to improve coverage of this population by providing ambulatory services in collaboration between various field partners in a single public health project.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two of the known Rom settlements were selected to receive vaccination. MdM was in charge of logistics, mediation and vaccinations at 13 sites and the DTARS and CG93 were in charge of vaccination at another 9 sites with support from MdM for mediation and logistics.
RESULTS: Between January and June 2012, 250 persons were vaccinated, 34.7% of the target population.
CONCLUSION: Coverage of the population after the vaccination campaign was still very low. The partnership between MdM, DTARS and CG93 helped to create a positive mobile action experience and extended prevention actions towards the most vulnerable populations excluded from conventional health care structures.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to improve coverage of this population by providing ambulatory services in collaboration between various field partners in a single public health project.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two of the known Rom settlements were selected to receive vaccination. MdM was in charge of logistics, mediation and vaccinations at 13 sites and the DTARS and CG93 were in charge of vaccination at another 9 sites with support from MdM for mediation and logistics.
RESULTS: Between January and June 2012, 250 persons were vaccinated, 34.7% of the target population.
CONCLUSION: Coverage of the population after the vaccination campaign was still very low. The partnership between MdM, DTARS and CG93 helped to create a positive mobile action experience and extended prevention actions towards the most vulnerable populations excluded from conventional health care structures.