MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3201/eid1308.061365

Медицинская библиотека · Emerging infectious diseases · 2007

Occupational risks during a monkeypox outbreak, Wisconsin, 2003.

Croft Donita R, Sotir Mark J, Williams Carl J, Kazmierczak James J, Wegner Mark V, Rausch Darren, Graham Mary Beth, Foldy Seth L, Wolters Mat, Damon Inger K, Karem Kevin L, Davis Jeffrey P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We determined factors associated with occupational transmission in Wisconsin during the 2003 outbreak of prairie dog--associated monkeypox virus infections. Our investigation included active contact surveillance, exposure-related interviews, and a veterinary facility cohort study. We identified 19 confirmed, 5 probable, and 3 suspected cases. Rash, headache, sweats, and fever were reported by > 80% of patients. Occupationally transmitted infections occurred in 12 veterinary staff, 2 pet store employees, and 2 animal distributors. The following were associated with illness: working directly with animal care (p = 0.002), being involved in prairie dog examination, caring for an animal within 6 feet of an ill prairie dog (p = 0.03), feeding an ill prairie dog (p = 0.002), and using an antihistamine (p = 0.04). Having never handled an ill prairie dog (p = 0.004) was protective. Veterinary staff used personal protective equipment sporadically. Our findings underscore the importance of standard veterinary infection-control guidelines.

Для цитирования: Croft Donita R, Sotir Mark J, Williams Carl J, Kazmierczak James J, Wegner Mark V, Rausch Darren, Graham Mary Beth, Foldy Seth L, Wolters Mat, Damon Inger K, Karem Kevin L, Davis Jeffrey P. Occupational risks during a monkeypox outbreak, Wisconsin, 2003.. Emerging infectious diseases. 2007. DOI: 10.3201/eid1308.061365.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.