MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000353892

Медицинская библиотека · Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders · 2013

Pharmacological treatment of dementia: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

van de Glind Esther M M, van Enst Wynanda A, van Munster Barbara C, Olde Rikkert Marcel G M, Scheltens Philip, Scholten Rob J P M, Hooft Lotty

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Until now, multiple reviews on the pharmacological treatment of dementia have been published.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review to summarize research findings and to identify gaps in the existing literature. We searched the literature and assessed the risk of bias of the included reviews. A team of clinical experts assessed the fields in which more research is necessary. Fifty-five reviews with a low risk of bias were included, most of them concerning the treatment of cognitive decline (n = 16) and behavioral symptoms (n = 10) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). For cognitive impairment, cholinesterase inhibitors (n = 13) and memantine (n = 7) were described most frequently. Little information was found about the treatment of depression in dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

For many current treatments, there is sufficient evidence. New research should focus on the symptomatic treatment of the earliest and most salient complaints in AD as well as on disease-modifying interventions acting at the level of the amyloid cascade.

Для цитирования: van de Glind Esther M M, van Enst Wynanda A, van Munster Barbara C, Olde Rikkert Marcel G M, Scheltens Philip, Scholten Rob J P M, Hooft Lotty. Pharmacological treatment of dementia: a scoping review of systematic reviews.. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders. 2013. DOI: 10.1159/000353892.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.