MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117011

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2025

Evaluation of imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam activities on a wide collection of French clinical Enterobacterales isolates.

Petillon Camille, Ulutuipalelei Mauli, Beyrouthy Racha, Proust Simon, Aissa Nejla, Bret Laurent, Brieu Nathalie, Carricajo Anne, Cattoir Vincent, Dauwalder Olivier, Degand Nicolas, Dortet Laurent, Doucet-Populaire Florence, Dubois Véronique, Grillon Antoine, Guérin François, Lanotte Philippe, Lemaitre Nadine, Leyssene David, Neuwirth Catherine, Patry Isabelle, Ploy Marie-Cécile, Podglajen Isabelle, Recule Christine, Rouis Karama, Réseau Onerba, Robert Jérôme, Bonnet Richard, Robin Frédéric

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In recent years, novel β-lactam-inhibitor combinations (imipenem-relebactam (I/R), meropenem-vaborbactam (M/V), aztreonam-avibactam (A/A)) have been commercialized and some are not yet on the market (cefepime-zidebactam (C/Z)). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of these β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) combinations against a wide collection of French clinical multiresistant Enterobacterales isolates and to assess the performance of the E-test MIC method for I/R and M/V. BL/BLIs MICs were determined by broth microdilution on a collection of 200 ESBL-producing and 414 carbapenem-resistant clinical Enterobacterales (K. pneumoniae (271), E. coli (245), E. cloacae complex (48), other species (50)) including 292 carbapenemase-producing isolates. E-test method was evaluated for the determination of I/R and M/V MICs using 131 isolates from this collection. All the combinations were active against most ESBL-producing isolates (99-100 %), but C/Z and A/A MIC90 were lower than that of I/R and M/V (2mg/L and 2mg/L versus 8mg/L and 8mg/L). The M/V and I/R E-tests performances were close to those required by the FDA recommendations: Categorical agreement (CA) and Essential agreement (EA) ≥ 90 %, Major discrepancy (MD) and Very major discrepancy (VMD) < 3 %): 96.9 % (CA), 92.4 % (EA), 1.2 % (MD), 6.1 % (VMD) for I/R and 94.7 % (CA), 96.9 % (EA), 4.1 % (MD), 8.8 % (VMD) for M/V. This work confirmed the interest of C/Z and A/A combinations against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates compared with M/V and I/R. Additionally, the findings indicate that the E-test method can be used for the determination of M/V and I/R MIC for E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains.

Для цитирования: Petillon Camille, Ulutuipalelei Mauli, Beyrouthy Racha, Proust Simon, Aissa Nejla, Bret Laurent, Brieu Nathalie, Carricajo Anne, Cattoir Vincent, Dauwalder Olivier, Degand Nicolas, Dortet Laurent, Doucet-Populaire Florence, Dubois Véronique, Grillon Antoine, Guérin François, Lanotte Philippe, Lemaitre Nadine, Leyssene David, Neuwirth Catherine, Patry Isabelle, Ploy Marie-Cécile, Podglajen Isabelle, Recule Christine, Rouis Karama, Réseau Onerba, Robert Jérôme, Bonnet Richard, Robin Frédéric. Evaluation of imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam activities on a wide collection of French clinical Enterobacterales isolates.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.