Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2006
How we do it: tympanoplasty: are different three- and four-frequency averages comparable?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dawes P J D, Welch D, Lee P
Аннотация
The results of tympanoplasty may be reported in a variety of ways. Pure-tone audiometry underpins reporting, yet there is no constancy in the pure-tone threshold average used. We examine the relationship between the 0.5, 1, 2 kHz, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz and 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz pure-tone audiometry averages. Using audiometric data collected for 77 patients, we have compared hearing threshold using three different frequency averages derived from pure-tone audiometry. The 0.5, 1, 2 kHz, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz and 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz three- and four-frequency averages are significantly different, this difference being primarily determined by the changes in the 4-kHz threshold. Using an average including 4 kHz results in 8% few patients achieving an ABG closure to within either 10 dB or 20 dB. When comparing surgical results with others, surgeons should use reports employing comparable audiometric measures of analysis.