Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2008
Speech perception in noise using directional microphones in open-canal hearing aids.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klemp Emily J, Dhar Sumitrajit
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Individuals with impaired hearing find it difficult to understand speech in the presence of background noise--a problem addressed effectively by directional microphones. As open-canal fittings have become increasingly popular in the recent past, so has the debate about the effective directional benefit available from these devices.
PURPOSE: This study investigates the benefit of directional microphones in two commercially available open-canal behind-the-ear hearing aids using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT).
STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen individuals, between 50 and 85 year of age, with high-frequency bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and no previous hearing aid experience participated in this study.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data Collection and Analysis: Individuals were asked to repeat sentences (presented at 0 degrees azimuth) in the presence of a diffuse-field uncorrelated broadband speech-shaped noise. HINT performance was compared across hearing instruments and conditions using a linear model with repeated measures.
RESULTS: There was a directional advantage of 2.6 dB as compared to the unaided condition. Average performance was worse in the omnidirectional mode as compared to the unaided condition.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that directional signal processing should not be precluded in open-canal instruments for listening in noisy environments.
PURPOSE: This study investigates the benefit of directional microphones in two commercially available open-canal behind-the-ear hearing aids using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT).
STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen individuals, between 50 and 85 year of age, with high-frequency bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and no previous hearing aid experience participated in this study.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data Collection and Analysis: Individuals were asked to repeat sentences (presented at 0 degrees azimuth) in the presence of a diffuse-field uncorrelated broadband speech-shaped noise. HINT performance was compared across hearing instruments and conditions using a linear model with repeated measures.
RESULTS: There was a directional advantage of 2.6 dB as compared to the unaided condition. Average performance was worse in the omnidirectional mode as compared to the unaided condition.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that directional signal processing should not be precluded in open-canal instruments for listening in noisy environments.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdFemaleHearing AidsHearing Loss, BilateralHearing Loss, High-FrequencyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoisePerceptual MaskingPresbycusisProsthesis DesignSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareSound LocalizationSpeech Reception Threshold Test