MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00127

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of internal medicine · 2009

Stepped-dose versus full-dose efavirenz for HIV infection and neuropsychiatric adverse events: a randomized trial.

Gutiérrez-Valencia Alicia, Viciana Pompeyo, Palacios Rosario, Ruiz-Valderas Rosa, Lozano Fernando, Terrón Alberto, Rivero Antonio, López-Cortés Luis F, Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

More than 50% of patients who start efavirenz treatment develop limiting neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs).

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether stepwise dosing of efavirenz decreases the incidence and severity of NPAEs while maintaining virologic efficacy.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

SETTING

7 HIV clinics in Spain.

PATIENTS: 114 HIV-infected patients eligible for efavirenz treatment plus 2 nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

INTERVENTION: Random assignment (by computer-generated sequence) to receive efavirenz, 200 mg/d on days 1 through 6, 400 mg/d on days 7 through 13, and 600 mg/d on day 14 and after, or efavirenz, 600 mg/d, from day 1. Both groups received 2 nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen by the patient's physician.

MEASUREMENTS: Neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep quality were assessed by questionnaires at 0, 7, 14, and 30 days. The primary outcome was efavirenz-related NPAEs during the first 2 weeks, and the secondary outcome was plasma HIV RNA level at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Compared with the stepped-dose group, the full-dose group had higher incidence and severity of dizziness (66.0% vs. 32.8%; P = 0.001), hangover (45.8% vs. 20.7%; P = 0.008), impaired concentration (22.9% vs. 8.9%; P = 0.038), and hallucinations (6.1% vs. 0%; P = 0.056) during the first week. From week 2, the incidence of efavirenz-related NPAEs was similar in both groups, although the severity was greater in the full-dose group. Virologic and immunologic efficacy seemed similar in both groups.

LIMITATIONS: The sample size was calculated on the basis of a high absolute difference in rates of efavirenz-related NPAEs between the groups. A lower absolute difference and a larger sample size could have made the differences between groups reach statistical significance beyond the first week. In addition, the sample size does not allow confirmation of similar efficacy between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Stepwise dose escalation of efavirenz over 2 weeks reduces the incidence and intensity of efavirenz-related NPAEs while maintaining efficacy.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía, Spain.

Для цитирования: Gutiérrez-Valencia Alicia, Viciana Pompeyo, Palacios Rosario, Ruiz-Valderas Rosa, Lozano Fernando, Terrón Alberto, Rivero Antonio, López-Cortés Luis F, Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Stepped-dose versus full-dose efavirenz for HIV infection and neuropsychiatric adverse events: a randomized trial.. Annals of internal medicine. 2009. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00127.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.