MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jdsade/enaf050

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2025

Writing outcomes and expressive language use of deaf high school students.

Dostal Hannah M, Wolbers Kimberly A, Spurgin Kelsey, Holcomb Leala

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study explores the writing performance of deaf high school students, focusing on narrative, argumentative, and argumentative-with-sources genres, and examining the role of expressive language proficiency and early language exposure. Using a descriptive research design, the writing samples of 75 students were scored for idea development, organization, style, sentence fluency, word choice, and conventions using automated scoring. Results revealed a range of low to mid performance, with the argumentative-with-sources writing scoring similarly to narrative writing and showing incremental growth across the grade levels. Early language exposure and proficiency in ASL or spoken English were linked to better writing outcomes, highlighting the importance of early and accessible language development. The results underscore the urgent need for linguistically responsive materials, reliable ASL assessments, and evidence-based instructional strategies for addressing the range of needs of deaf students. The study calls for further exploration of the patterns observed in students' writing to design instruction that builds on strengths and addresses needs, enhancing academic success and societal participation for deaf learners.

Для цитирования: Dostal Hannah M, Wolbers Kimberly A, Spurgin Kelsey, Holcomb Leala. Writing outcomes and expressive language use of deaf high school students.. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/jdsade/enaf050.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.