Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2011
[The validity of the SET 5-10 (language level test for children aged between five and ten years): first analyses].
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Metz D, Belhadj Kouider E, Karpinski N, Petermann F
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: No other child developmental domain is as frequently affected by disorders as language acquisition. The SET 5-10 (language level test for children aged between 5 and 10 years), was developed to assess specific language disorders.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the ability of the SET 5-10 to differentiate between the developmental increases of speech competence, present deficits resulting from previous speech deficits and the probability of assessing possible speech deficits of children with an immigrant background.
METHODS: Based on data of the norm sample (n=1,052; 51.8% female) different cohorts (age-groups, children with speech impairment problems and children with immigrant background) are compared by Multivariate analysis of variance.
RESULTS: In all subtests a steady increase of performance with increasing age could be found. The means of children with previous grammar deficits (n=46) and children with immigrant background (n=143) are significantly lower than those of the reference group.
CONCLUSION: The results presented offer first proof of a differentiated and economic diagnosis of language achievement of children 5-10 years of age.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the ability of the SET 5-10 to differentiate between the developmental increases of speech competence, present deficits resulting from previous speech deficits and the probability of assessing possible speech deficits of children with an immigrant background.
METHODS: Based on data of the norm sample (n=1,052; 51.8% female) different cohorts (age-groups, children with speech impairment problems and children with immigrant background) are compared by Multivariate analysis of variance.
RESULTS: In all subtests a steady increase of performance with increasing age could be found. The means of children with previous grammar deficits (n=46) and children with immigrant background (n=143) are significantly lower than those of the reference group.
CONCLUSION: The results presented offer first proof of a differentiated and economic diagnosis of language achievement of children 5-10 years of age.