MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000004298

Медицинская библиотека · Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2024

Comparing Cochlear Implant Outcomes in 100 Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Managed With Observation, Radiosurgery, or Microsurgery: A Multi-Institutional Review.

Dornhoffer James R, Marinelli John P, Lohse Christine M, Cottrell Justin, McMenomey Sean O, Roland J Thomas, Thompson Nicholas J, Brown Kevin D, Lucas Jacob C, Babu Seilesh C, Lindquist Nathan R, Perkins Elizabeth L, Rahne Torsten, Plontke Stefan K, Tan Donald, Hunter Jacob B, Harvey Erin, Deep Nicholas L, Cerasiello Samantha Y, Kircher Matthew L, Espahbodi Mana, Tooker Evan L, Lloyd Simon K W, Carlson Matthew L

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgery.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Eleven tertiary academic medical centers.

PATIENTS: One hundred patients with sporadic VS who received an ipsilateral CI.

INTERVENTIONS: Ipsilateral cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure-tone thresholds, monosyllabic speech perception testing scores, and rates of open-set speech acquisition.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients studied, 54 underwent microsurgery, 26 underwent radiosurgery, 19 continued observation, and 1 underwent multimodal therapy. Among all patients, the median post-implantation pure-tone average was 31 dB (interquartile range [IQR] 25-39 dB) and the median monosyllabic speech perception score was 30% (IQR 0-60%) at a median of 12 months (IQR 5-25 months) post-implantation. Patients who were managed with microsurgery (median speech perception score 11%, IQR 0-52%) exhibited poorer implant outcomes overall compared with those managed with observation (median speech perception score 52%, IQR 40-72%) or radiosurgery (median speech perception score 30%, IQR 16-60%). Open-set speech perception was achieved in 61% of patients managed with microsurgery, 100% with observation, and 80% with radiosurgery. In a multivariable setting, those managed with observation (p = 0.02) or who underwent radiosurgery (p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to achieve open-set speech perception compared with patients who underwent microsurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implants offer benefit in selected patients with sporadic VS. Although achieved in over half of people after microsurgery, open-set speech perception is more reliably attained in patients who are treated with observation or radiosurgery compared with microsurgical resection. These data may inform patient counseling and VS tumor management in people who may benefit from implantation.

Для цитирования: Dornhoffer James R, Marinelli John P, Lohse Christine M, Cottrell Justin, McMenomey Sean O, Roland J Thomas, Thompson Nicholas J, Brown Kevin D, Lucas Jacob C, Babu Seilesh C, Lindquist Nathan R, Perkins Elizabeth L, Rahne Torsten, Plontke Stefan K, Tan Donald, Hunter Jacob B, Harvey Erin, Deep Nicholas L, Cerasiello Samantha Y, Kircher Matthew L, Espahbodi Mana, Tooker Evan L, Lloyd Simon K W, Carlson Matthew L. Comparing Cochlear Implant Outcomes in 100 Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Managed With Observation, Radiosurgery, or Microsurgery: A Multi-Institutional Review.. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004298.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.