MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jnma.2018.03.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the National Medical Association · 2018

Implementation of the NCAA Sickle Cell Trait Screening Policy: A Survey of Athletic Staff and Student-athletes.

Baker Charlotte, Powell Jill, Le Dominic, Creary Melissa S, Daley Lori-Ann, McDonald Mary Anne, Royal Charmaine Dm

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe the perspectives and experiences of athletic trainers, coaches, and student-athletes approximately three years post-implementation of the NCAA sickle cell trait (SCT) screening policy.

PARTICIPANTS

Two-hundred and eight student-athletes, 32 athletic trainers, and 43 coaches from 10 NCAA Division I (DI) institutions in North Carolina from January to June 2014.

METHODS

Two online surveys were used to assess knowledge, perspectives, and experiences.

RESULTS

Athletic staff were more supportive than student-athletes of the need for the policy. Noted challenges included variation in implementation and follow-up for SCT-positive athletes, financial costs to institutions and athletes, and timing of the screening.

CONCLUSIONS

More education about SCT is needed for student-athletes and athletic staff in order to help make the implementation more successful. All parties need to be in agreement regarding the importance of knowing which student-athletes have SCT and how that information will be utilized.

Для цитирования: Baker Charlotte, Powell Jill, Le Dominic, Creary Melissa S, Daley Lori-Ann, McDonald Mary Anne, Royal Charmaine Dm. Implementation of the NCAA Sickle Cell Trait Screening Policy: A Survey of Athletic Staff and Student-athletes.. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2018.03.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.