MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30147-6

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2008

Comparison between telelaryngoscopy and suspension laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of benign vocal fold lesions.

Neto José Arruda Mendes, Pinna Bruno Resende, Neto José Caporrino, de Sá Pedroso José Eduardo

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Proper diagnosis of laryngeal benign lesions still brings doubts among experienced laryngologists, despite current diagnostic progress.

AIM: The goal of this study was to compare telelaryngoscopy (preoperative) with suspension laryngoscopy (intraoperative) on the diagnosis of vocal fold benign lesions.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We carried out a restrospective study analyzing 79 charts from patients followed up in a University Hospital. In all the charts there was at least diagnostic hypothesis suggested by telelaryngoscopy, which was later on compared to intraoperative findings of suspension laryngoscopy.

RESULTS

Almost two-thirds of the patients were females, with ages varying between 12 and 66 years (mean of 37 years). Of the 79 patients studied, we diagnosed 95 lesions with telelaryngoscopy and 124 with suspension laryngoscopy. The most frequently found benign lesion was the vocal polyp in both methods. In 64.5% of the cases the diagnosis of the lesions in the outpatient ward was the same as those in the surgical findings.

CONCLUSION

Laryngologists must be prepared to alter their surgical planning and treatment approaches because of diagnostic changes that may happen during surgery.

Для цитирования: Neto José Arruda Mendes, Pinna Bruno Resende, Neto José Caporrino, de Sá Pedroso José Eduardo. Comparison between telelaryngoscopy and suspension laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of benign vocal fold lesions.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30147-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.