Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
Effects of growth hormone treatment on adult height in severely short children with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meyerhoff Nadine, Haffner Dieter, Staude Hagen, Wühl Elke, Marx Michaela, Beetz Rolf, Querfeld Uwe, Holder Martin, Billing Heiko, Rabl Wolfgang, Schröder Carmen, Hiort Olaf, Brämswig Jürgen H, Richter-Unruh Annette, Schnabel Dirk, Živičnjak Miroslav, Hypophosphatemic Rickets Study Group of the “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderendokrinologie und -diabetologie” and “Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie”
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We recently showed that a 3-year growth hormone (GH) treatment improves linear growth in severely short children with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH). It is unknown if GH therapy increases adult height in XLH patients.
METHODS: We carried out a follow-up analysis of a randomized controlled open-label GH study in short prepubertal children with XLH on phosphate and active vitamin D treatment. The changes in SD scores (SDS) of height, sitting height, leg and arm length, and sitting height index (i.e., the ratio between sitting height and height) were analyzed in 11 out of 16 patients followed-up until adult height.
RESULTS: At baseline, XLH patients showed disproportionately short stature with reduced standardized height (-3.2 ± 0.6), sitting height (-1.7 ± 0.6), leg (-3.7 ± 0.7) and arm (-2.5 ± 0.8) length, and markedly elevated sitting height index (3.3 ± 0.6; each p < 0.01 versus healthy children). In GH-treated patients, adult height, sitting height, leg length, and arm length exceeded baseline values by 0.7 SDS, 1.7 SDS, 0.7 SDS, and 1.2 SDS respectively, although this was only significant for sitting height. In controls, no significant changes in linear body dimensions were noted. Adult height did not statistically differ between groups (-2.4 ± 0.7 vs -3.3 ± 1.2, p = 0.082). GH did not exaggerate body disproportion.
CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone treatment did not significantly increase adult height in this group of short children with XLH, which may be at least partly due to the small number of patients included in our study.
METHODS: We carried out a follow-up analysis of a randomized controlled open-label GH study in short prepubertal children with XLH on phosphate and active vitamin D treatment. The changes in SD scores (SDS) of height, sitting height, leg and arm length, and sitting height index (i.e., the ratio between sitting height and height) were analyzed in 11 out of 16 patients followed-up until adult height.
RESULTS: At baseline, XLH patients showed disproportionately short stature with reduced standardized height (-3.2 ± 0.6), sitting height (-1.7 ± 0.6), leg (-3.7 ± 0.7) and arm (-2.5 ± 0.8) length, and markedly elevated sitting height index (3.3 ± 0.6; each p < 0.01 versus healthy children). In GH-treated patients, adult height, sitting height, leg length, and arm length exceeded baseline values by 0.7 SDS, 1.7 SDS, 0.7 SDS, and 1.2 SDS respectively, although this was only significant for sitting height. In controls, no significant changes in linear body dimensions were noted. Adult height did not statistically differ between groups (-2.4 ± 0.7 vs -3.3 ± 1.2, p = 0.082). GH did not exaggerate body disproportion.
CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone treatment did not significantly increase adult height in this group of short children with XLH, which may be at least partly due to the small number of patients included in our study.