m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The Journal of otolaryngology · 2000

Clinicomicrobiologic evaluation of active tubotympanic type chronic suppurative otitis media.

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Khanna V, Chander J, Nagarkar N M, Dass A

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study was conducted to determine the spectrum of micro-organisms encountered in patients with active-stage chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) (tubotympanic type) and to see whether prescribing an antibiotic after culture sensitivity was more beneficial as compared to initial treatment without cultures.

DESIGN: Prospective randomized study of 110 patients of active CSOM (tubotympanic type) divided into two groups of 55 cases each.

SETTING: Departments of Ear, Nose and Throat and Microbiology of a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS: The patients in group A were prescribed an antibiotic according to the culture and sensitivity, whereas in group B, culture was not done at the first visit, and a broad-spectrum antimicrobial, namely, co-trimoxazole, was prescribed blindly for a maximum period of 2 weeks. The cases that still had ear discharge were then subjected to culture and sensitivity and the antibiotic was prescribed accordingly.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients in group A were subjected to bacterial culture and sensitivity and fungal culture. Only failed cases in group B were subjected to the same.

RESULTS: In group A, 47 patients (85.50%) had positive bacterial culture and 20 patients had positive fungal culture. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common bacterial isolate. All of these 47 patients had a dry ear with a maximum 2 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Among the remaining 8 patients who had negative bacterial culture, 5 patients (9.0%) showed fungal isolates on culture and responded to topical antifungal treatment. The remaining 3 failed cases (5.5%) responded to daily dry mopping alone. In group B, 41 patients (74.54%) attained a dry ear. Bacterial culture and sensitivity were done in the remaining 14 (25.46%) failed cases. The culture was positive in 11 patients (20.0%) and sterile in 3 patients (5.5%). In the latter group, only 1 patient had fungus on culture and the remaining 2 patients responded to daily dry mopping alone, which was done at a maximum for a week only. The most common fungal pathogen isolated was Aspergillus flavus.

CONCLUSIONS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common bacteria and Aspergillus flavus the most common fungus isolated in this study. In group A patients, the failed cases were less as compared to the control group B, but the p value was .2. Hence, there is no definite role of culture and sensitivity in the initial management plan of all cases of CSOM. Ideally, every such case should be prescribed a broad-spectrum antibiotic and only in failed cases should culture and sensitivity be done.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты