MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-133-9-200011070-00009

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of internal medicine · 2000

Comparison of oral fluconazole and itraconazole for progressive, nonmeningeal coccidioidomycosis. A randomized, double-blind trial. Mycoses Study Group.

Galgiani J N, Catanzaro A, Cloud G A, Johnson R H, Williams P L, Mirels L F, Nassar F, Lutz J E, Stevens D A, Sharkey P K, Singh V R, Larsen R A, Delgado K L, Flanigan C, Rinaldi M G

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In previous open-label noncomparative clinical trials, both fluconazole and itraconazole were effective therapy for progressive forms of coccidioidomycosis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether fluconazole or itraconazole is superior for treatment of nonmeningeal progressive coccidioidal infections.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

7 treatment centers in California, Arizona, and Texas.

PATIENTS: 198 patients with chronic pulmonary, soft tissue, or skeletal coccidioidal infections.

INTERVENTION: Oral fluconazole, 400 mg/d, or itraconazole, 200 mg twice daily.

MEASUREMENTS: After 4, 8, and 12 months, a predefined scoring system was used to assess severity of infection. Findings were compared with those at baseline.

RESULTS

Overall, 50% of patients (47 of 94) and 63% of patients (61 of 97) responded to 8 months of treatment with fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively (difference, 13 percentage points [95% CI, -2 to 28 percentage points]; P = 0.08). Patients with skeletal infections responded twice as frequently to itraconazole as to fluconazole. By 12 months, 57% of patients had responded to fluconazole and 72% had responded to itraconazole (difference, 15 percentage points [CI, 0.003 to 30 percentage points]; P = 0.05). Soft tissue disease was associated with increased likelihood of response, as in previous studies. Azole drug was detected in serum specimens from all but 3 patients; however, drug concentrations were not helpful in predicting outcome. Relapse rates after discontinuation of therapy did not differ significantly between groups (28% after fluconazole treatment and 18% after itraconazole treatment). Both drugs were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither fluconazole nor itraconazole showed statistically superior efficacy in nonmeningeal coccidioidomycosis, although there is a trend toward slightly greater efficacy with itraconazole at the doses studied.

Для цитирования: Galgiani J N, Catanzaro A, Cloud G A, Johnson R H, Williams P L, Mirels L F, Nassar F, Lutz J E, Stevens D A, Sharkey P K, Singh V R, Larsen R A, Delgado K L, Flanigan C, Rinaldi M G. Comparison of oral fluconazole and itraconazole for progressive, nonmeningeal coccidioidomycosis. A randomized, double-blind trial. Mycoses Study Group.. Annals of internal medicine. 2000. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-9-200011070-00009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.