DOI 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181dbb35e
Efficacy of cartilage palisade tympanoplasty: randomized controlled trial.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To calculate the efficacy (evaluating both morphologic and functional results) of cartilage palisade tympanoplasty (CPT) in comparison with tympanoplasty involving a temporalis muscle fascia (FT) graft.
STUDY
DESIGN
Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING
General Hospital.
PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-three patients with chronic otitis media who were recruited for the study between the years 1997 and 2002.
INTERVENTION(S): Sixty-four patients were randomly allocated to the group receiving CPT and the remaining 59 to the group undergoing tympanoplasty with FT.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was defined as "morphological success," a composite variable that includes the absence of perforation, atelectasis, atrophy, lateralization, otorrhea, and blunting. The secondary endpoints were defined as functional hearing results.
RESULTS
Both treatment groups were homogeneous with regard to the main baseline characteristics studied. Morphologic success at 24 months in the CPT group was 51 of 62 (82.26%), whereas in the FT group, it was 38 of 58 (64.41%; p = 0.03; relative risk = 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.60). The relative risk for morphologic success, adjusted for a multivariate model, was 1.36 (95% CI = 1.11-1.38), whereas the adjusted NNT was 5 (95% CI = 4-15). No statistically significant differences were found between the functional results of both treatment groups.
CONCLUSION
Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty is a more effective technique for reconstructing the tympanic membrane than FT for the population studied.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.