Acta oto-laryngologica · 2010
Results of revision mastoidectomy with Piezosurgery(®).
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Salami Angelo, Mora Renzo, Dellepiane Massimo, Crippa Barbara, Guastini Luca
Аннотация
CONCLUSION: For otologic revision surgery, the advantage of the piezoelectric device appears real because it is possible to perform a 'blind' cutting of bone with fewer precautions necessary for soft tissues such as the facial nerve, lateral sinus, and dura mater.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of the piezoelectric device in revision surgery for chronic otitis media.
METHODS: A total of 30 patients had revision mastoidectomy with previous canal wall up mastoidectomy. The piezoelectric device was used in all intraoperative steps. Before surgery and 1 month and 1 year after surgery, all the patients underwent the following instrumental examinations: pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response, and electronystamographic recording.
RESULTS: The piezoelectric device provided effective cutting, with excellent control and without side effects on the adjacent structures of the middle and inner ear (lateral sinus, facial nerve, and/or dura mater). Postoperatively, all patients had an uneventful recovery with no evidence of audiovestibular deficit or side effects. Among 30 cases followed for 1 year, 29 (97%) maintained a dry and safe ear. Intermittent otorrhea with perforation of the tympanic membrane occurred in one patient (3%).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of the piezoelectric device in revision surgery for chronic otitis media.
METHODS: A total of 30 patients had revision mastoidectomy with previous canal wall up mastoidectomy. The piezoelectric device was used in all intraoperative steps. Before surgery and 1 month and 1 year after surgery, all the patients underwent the following instrumental examinations: pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response, and electronystamographic recording.
RESULTS: The piezoelectric device provided effective cutting, with excellent control and without side effects on the adjacent structures of the middle and inner ear (lateral sinus, facial nerve, and/or dura mater). Postoperatively, all patients had an uneventful recovery with no evidence of audiovestibular deficit or side effects. Among 30 cases followed for 1 year, 29 (97%) maintained a dry and safe ear. Intermittent otorrhea with perforation of the tympanic membrane occurred in one patient (3%).