Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2008
Bivalve cartilage inlay myringoplasty: an office-based procedure for closing small to medium-sized tympanic membrane perforations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Monfared Ashkan, Bergeron Chris M, Ortiz Justin, Lee Howard, Kamine Kim, Dray Todd, Gunsalus Richard
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bivalve inlay cartilage-perichondrium myringoplasty (BCM) is successful in closing tympanic membrane perforations in an office setting.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with chronic perforations underwent BCM under local and topical anesthesia. Success was defined as complete closure of perforation at follow-up of at least 1 month. Predictors of success were identified by comparing the success and failure groups on pre- and postoperative pure tone average (PTA), patient demographics (age, gender), and characteristics of the perforations (size, location, duration, etiology).
RESULTS: A total of 145 procedures were performed and the patients were followed for 1 to 78 months. The success rate for perforations smaller than 4 mm was 75 percent. Size of the perforation, and pre- and postoperative PTAs were significantly different between the two groups. The only significant predictors of success were preoperative PTA and size of perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: BCM is a viable option for closure of small and medium-sized perforations in an office setting.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with chronic perforations underwent BCM under local and topical anesthesia. Success was defined as complete closure of perforation at follow-up of at least 1 month. Predictors of success were identified by comparing the success and failure groups on pre- and postoperative pure tone average (PTA), patient demographics (age, gender), and characteristics of the perforations (size, location, duration, etiology).
RESULTS: A total of 145 procedures were performed and the patients were followed for 1 to 78 months. The success rate for perforations smaller than 4 mm was 75 percent. Size of the perforation, and pre- and postoperative PTAs were significantly different between the two groups. The only significant predictors of success were preoperative PTA and size of perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: BCM is a viable option for closure of small and medium-sized perforations in an office setting.