DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.04.008
Digital images for postsurgical follow-up of tympanostomy tubes in remote Alaska.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine if video otoscope still images of the tympanic membrane taken in remote clinics are comparable to an in-person microscopic examination for follow-up care.
DESIGN
Comparative concordance, diagnostic reliability.
METHODS
Community health aide/practitioners in remote Alaska imaged 70 ears following tympanostomy tube placement. The patients were then examined in person by two otolaryngologists. Images were later reviewed at 8 and 14 weeks.
RESULTS
Intraprovider concordance for physical examination findings was: "Tube in," 94 percent -97 percent (kappa = 0.89-0.94); "Tube patent," 94 percent -97 percent (kappa = 0.89-0.94); "Drainage," 90 percent -96 percent (kappa = -0.04-0.38); "Perforation," 90 percent -96 percent (kappa = 0.61-0.82); "Granulation," 97 percent -100 percent (kappa = 0.49-1.0); "Middle ear fluid," 88 percent -96 percent (kappa = 0.28-0.71); "Retracted," 83 percent -91 percent (kappa = 0.26-0.58). These agreement rates are similar to interprovider concordance when two otolaryngologists examine the same patient in person. Intraprovider concordance for diagnoses was 76 percent -80 percent (kappa = 0.64-0.71) and 77 percent -88 percent (kappa = 0.66-0.81) when poor images were excluded. Interprovider diagnostic concordance for the in-person exam was 89 percent (kappa = 0.83).
CONCLUSION
Video-otoscopy images of the tympanic membrane are comparable to an in-person examination for assessment and treatment of patients following tympanostomy tubes. Store-and-forward telemedicine is an acceptable method of following patients post tympanostomy tube placement.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.